CompliGUARD compliance platform logoCompliGUARD
    TGA · AHPRA · FSANZ · ACCC

    What claims can Australian protein powder brands make on packaging and social media?

    CompliGUARD reviews this compliance area against TGA · AHPRA · FSANZ · ACCC frameworks for Australian health brands — here's what the regulations say.

    CompliGUARD reviews protein powder claims against FSANZ Standard 1.2.7 of the Food Standards Code. Most protein powders in Australia are classified as foods regulated under FSANZ, meaning claims must comply with Standard 1.2.7 — nutrition content claims require meeting Schedule 1 thresholds, and health claims must be from the pre-approved list or self-substantiated.

    The rule: Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, Standard 1.2.7; Standard 2.9.4 (Formulated Supplementary Sports Foods)

    Protein powders marketed as sports nutrition products are typically regulated under FSANZ Standard 2.9.4 (Formulated Supplementary Sports Foods), which sets compositional requirements and permitted claim types. Where a protein powder is marketed for general nutrition rather than sports performance, Standard 1.2.7 applies. Where a protein powder is marketed with claims that it treats, prevents, or modifies a health condition — such as muscle injury repair or recovery from illness — it may be classified as a therapeutic good requiring ARTG listing. The classification depends on how the product is presented, not just its formulation.

    What this means in practice

    • Confirm whether your product is classified under FSANZ Standard 2.9.4 (sports food) or Standard 1.2.7 (general food) — the claim rules differ between these standards.
    • For Standard 2.9.4 products, claims must comply with the permitted representations in that standard — including restrictions on implied therapeutic outcomes.
    • For 'high in protein' claims under Standard 1.2.7, confirm the product meets both the per-serve and percentage-of-energy thresholds in Schedule 1.
    • Do not use muscle repair, recovery from injury, or treatment of a physiological condition as claim language — these cross into therapeutic territory and may trigger TGA classification.
    • Influencer content commissioned by protein powder brands is subject to the same FSANZ and ACCC rules as direct brand advertising.

    Common mistakes

    Mistake

    Using 'muscle repair' or 'repairs muscle tissue' language

    Problem

    'Muscle repair' language implies treatment of a physiological process in a way that may constitute a therapeutic claim under the TGA's definition — positioning the product as a therapeutic good requiring ARTG listing. This is one of the most common classification triggers for protein powder brands.

    Fix

    Use claim language that stays within FSANZ Standard 2.9.4 permitted representations: 'supports muscle recovery after exercise' where this aligns with an approved claim, rather than 'repairs muscle tissue.'

    Mistake

    Making claims about mental performance or cognitive function

    Problem

    Cognitive function and mental performance claims on protein powders are high-risk — they may be outside FSANZ permitted claims and may constitute therapeutic representations. AHPRA-registered practitioners recommending protein powders for cognitive outcomes face additional obligations.

    Fix

    Restrict claims to the FSANZ pre-approved list and Standard 2.9.4 permitted representations. Do not add cognitive or mental health claims without regulatory advice.

    Mistake

    Presenting before-and-after body composition images alongside health claims

    Problem

    Before-and-after body composition images combined with health claims create an implied outcome guarantee that may be misleading under the Australian Consumer Law, regardless of whether the individual claims are FSANZ-compliant.

    Fix

    Separate visual content from health claims. Where before-and-after imagery is used, ensure no health claim language accompanies it that implies the visual outcome is typical or guaranteed.

    Compliant vs non-compliant example

    ❌ NON-COMPLIANT

    Using 'muscle repair' or 'repairs muscle tissue' language

    ✅ COMPLIANT

    Use claim language that stays within FSANZ Standard 2.9.4 permitted representations: 'supports muscle recovery after exercise' where this aligns with an approved claim, rather than 'repairs muscle tissue.'

    The enforcement context

    The ACCC has taken enforcement action against protein supplement brands for misleading body composition and performance claims. The TGA has pursued protein powder brands where therapeutic claims resulted in products being treated as unregistered therapeutic goods. Both enforcement pathways are active in this category.

    Before you publish, check it.

    CompliGUARD reviews protein powder marketing content against FSANZ Standard 1.2.7, Standard 2.9.4, and ACCC Australian Consumer Law requirements.

    Start free review

    Related questions

    Regulatory references

    • Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, Standard 1.2.7 (Nutrition, Health and Related Claims)
    • Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, Standard 2.9.4 (Formulated Supplementary Sports Foods)
    • Australian Consumer Law (Competition and Consumer Act 2010, Schedule 2), s.18
    • TGA Food-Medicine Interface Guidance Tool