TGA · AHPRA · FSANZ · ACCC

    What are the advertising rules for pharmacists in Australia?

    CompliGUARD reviews this compliance area against TGA · AHPRA · FSANZ · ACCC frameworks for Australian health brands — here's what the regulations say.

    CompliGUARD reviews pharmacist advertising against AHPRA's rules under the National Law and the TGA Advertising Code. Pharmacists are registered with AHPRA and must comply with s.133 of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law for advertising of pharmacy services — and additionally with the TGA Advertising Code where advertising involves the promotion of therapeutic goods sold or dispensed through the pharmacy.

    The rule: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law / Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021, s.133 HPRNL; TGAC 2021; Pharmacy Board of Australia Advertising Guidance

    Pharmacy advertising operates across two regulatory frameworks simultaneously. As AHPRA-registered practitioners, pharmacists must comply with s.133 prohibitions when advertising pharmacy services — including professional services, health consultations, and compounding. Where advertising promotes specific therapeutic goods available in the pharmacy, the TGA Advertising Code 2021 applies to those product promotions. A pharmacy's social media presence that promotes both services and products must therefore comply with both frameworks at once — with AHPRA prohibitions governing service advertising and the TGA Code governing product advertising.

    What this means in practice

    • Separate service advertising (pharmacy consultations, medication management) from product advertising (specific medicines, supplements) — each category carries different compliance obligations.
    • For service advertising: apply AHPRA s.133 prohibitions — no patient testimonials, no outcome guarantees, no superiority claims, no inducements.
    • For product advertising of Listed Medicines: apply TGA Advertising Code requirements — AUST number, mandatory statements, permitted claims, testimonial rules.
    • Medication promotion through social media is a high-risk area — review every post featuring a specific product for TGA compliance in addition to AHPRA obligations.
    • Compounding pharmacy advertising requires particular care — claims about compounded medicines must not imply TGA-assessed efficacy the products do not have.

    Common mistakes

    Mistake

    Using customer reviews of pharmacy services in advertising

    Problem

    Reviews praising a pharmacy's service quality, staff helpfulness, or recommendation effectiveness constitute testimonials under s.133(1)(c) when used in advertising — the AHPRA prohibition applies to pharmacy service testimonials just as to clinical service testimonials.

    Fix

    Do not repost or feature customer reviews of pharmacy services in advertising. Factual service information (opening hours, services available, location) is permissible.

    Mistake

    Promoting supplement products in the pharmacy without mandatory statements

    Problem

    Social media posts from a pharmacy account promoting specific Listed Medicines — including vitamins, minerals, and herbal products — must include the AUST number, sponsor name, and 'always read the label' statement. Pharmacy social media posts are subject to the same TGA Code requirements as brand advertising.

    Fix

    Apply TGA mandatory statement requirements to every social media post featuring a Listed Medicine product. Include the AUST number and 'always read the label' statement in every such post.

    Mistake

    Making claims about compounded medicines that imply TGA-assessed efficacy

    Problem

    Compounded medicines are not listed or registered on the ARTG and have not been assessed by the TGA for efficacy. Advertising compounded products with efficacy claims implies TGA assessment that does not exist — this is both misleading under the ACL and potentially a breach of the TGA Act.

    Fix

    Restrict compounding advertising to the service offered — the ability to compound — without making efficacy claims about specific compounded products.

    Compliant vs non-compliant example

    ❌ NON-COMPLIANT

    Using customer reviews of pharmacy services in advertising

    ✅ COMPLIANT

    Do not repost or feature customer reviews of pharmacy services in advertising. Factual service information (opening hours, services available, location) is permissible.

    The enforcement context

    The Pharmacy Board of Australia actively monitors pharmacy advertising compliance. AHPRA's 2024–25 complaint data includes pharmacy in its profession breakdown. The TGA separately monitors product advertising by retail pharmacies — both frameworks are actively enforced and pharmacy social media is a specific monitoring focus.

    Before you publish, check it.

    CompliGUARD reviews pharmacy advertising against both AHPRA Guidelines s.133 and TGA Advertising Code requirements — covering service and product advertising simultaneously.

    Start free review

    Related questions

    Regulatory references

    • Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, s.133
    • AHPRA Guidelines for Advertising a Regulated Health Service, December 2020
    • Pharmacy Board of Australia — Advertising Guidance
    • Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 (Cth)
    • Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth)